Mike and Dave Need Wedding Dates (2016)

This movie had all the hallmarks of a movie I would enjoy watching on a plane, by which I mean that Zac Efron is in it. Sadly, unlike most of the Fun Garbage I’ve watched recently (I'll post another Zac Efron Fun Garbage review soon), this movie just kind of made me angry. 
It felt like way someone had an idea for a movie - two man-children try getting respectable wedding dates by way of national advertising, and they turn out to be just as terrible - but whoever had that idea forgot to flesh any of it out or plan any jokes. It had maybe a couple of moments I giggled at? I'm being generous. There’s a canonically, openly bisexual character (I’m not totally into bisexuality being automatically conflated with promiscuity thing but baby steps)! I didn’t think the performances were great - disappointingly, even normally decent actors felt sluggish - and overall, I found the whole movie quite irritating and immature. Adam Devine was at peak obnoxiousness and very few people didn't feel obnoxious - Anna Kendrick was grating deeply on my nerves. It’s not automatically bad to be silly, but there’s got to at least be something in the way you tell it that hooks me. 
Look, it’s bad when even Sleeping Pill Addled Sara can’t mute the angry feminism for five minutes on a plane. I’m always really hyped at movies and shows that let women be gross and unpolished, so I was thankful for that and had high hopes for this movie on that front. I was not so into the whole good girl/bad girl bullshit the movie constantly buys into and the focus on female respectability. If you’re actively saying the dichotomy is fake then I can get on board, and at times I felt like the movie was almost doing that, but most of the time it was not getting there. You’re not making fun of the thing, you’re just being the thing. I don’t know, I have a lot of thoughts and I’m not going to start my essay on the character of Cousin Terry, but just know that this movie didn’t manage to be Fun Garbage to me and  instead came down quite solidly as irritating and superficial and never really managed to expand on any of the ideas it brought up.
Rating: 2.5/10 - and the points are basically for bisexuality, Zac Efron and allowing women to be gross and also have orgasms onscreen.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Hocus Pocus (1993)

Apparently  Hocus Pocus  is like…a big thing for people in my generation? I hadn’t seen it before, corrected by my friends on a decidedly eclectic movie night.  It’s - look, it’s something else. I think most of the love for it depends on a great deal of nostalgia, which was obviously absent from my viewing - I understood it, but I didn’t have childhood ties to it. It’s extraordinarily campy, which is fun, and Sarah Jessica Parker has truly never reached the same heights as she did in this. Bette Midler heaves the movie on her shoulders and gives it a heightened surreality that it needed to keep it from just veering into ridiculous unhinged levels beyond enjoyability. Any movie that relies this much on child acting is going to be hit and miss, though, and the teenagers are pretty rough to watch as they attempt to save the town from three returned-from-the-”dead” witches. There’s a younger sister character whose actress outdoes everyone else and is very nearly the highlight of the who
Read more

200 Degrees (2017)

After a brief flirtation with serious pop cultural critique, I'm back to reviewing the horror movie rubbish that no one else has seen (and for good reason). What better way to settle into that niche than to watch one of the many hundreds of Saw copycats on the market? It's my own personal white noise. Saw itself is one of the most problematic and ideologically iffy film franchises around with one of the best first movies, and I'm unapologetically hyped for the next movie to come out. The ripoffs, however, are...something.  In my time watching blatant Saw ripoffs, I have seen some utter garbage. Even I, the most dedicated terrible movie watcher, could not sit through the monotony and bad acting of 2011's Vile . I struggled through 2006 Thai thriller 13 Beloved , even when it made me near gag, or 2014's Circle , even though I nearly fell asleep . Over time, I've enjoyed the occasional movie in this specific set up: I didn't mind the divisive Would You Ra
Read more

2017 in Film: Favourites, Letdowns and Reflections

It's the end of the year, and the film snobs of the world are reflecting on their years in pop culture. As one of the gang - now with my very own bogus DMCA notice! - I figured I would jump on in. Of course, there are lots of caveats to that. I live in Australia, where several of the last quarter films with award potential have their wide release withheld til the next year. I don't go to previews, with the exception of the occasional rubbish horror movie, and I am not drawn to a lot of wide release movies. Dunkirk ? More like...um... done-urgh . A lot of it is to do with my exhaustion with male narratives and a lot of the industry's treatment of women and anything non white or heterosexual, both real and in fiction. I love the art form, but it's been a tough year for trying to avoid content that would make me extremely angry in a very real way. As mentioned previously, I haven't seen any new releases - it's been the busiest time of the year in my sector - so
Read more